My suggestion is a required unanimous vote or requiring a majority when all players have voted ("enough" being at least 5/6 players, pref. The current votekick system only requires a majority vote/"enough" players, meaning if 3 players vote yes and 2 abstain it's an automatic kick! This is no uncommon thing, every MvM match I've been in there's alway that one guy convinced he's better and convinced that the threat of a votekick is enough to bully someone into doing what they say, even when he doesn't have the needed 2 votes to back it up. So what do you suggest? Is it fair to other players that they be subject to what can be best described as blatant bullying? Or is it better to simply allow the players more fit for the game to muscle everyone else playing out of their way? That's 5 waves down the drain because some self-proclaimed "elitist" doesn't feel that their teammates are good enough. Seeing as how they couldn't "carry" the rest of us (and from my PoV, I feel it might as well have been the other way around), they figured it was in their best interest (them being the players who just joined) to systematically votekick the rest of us. 3 players on the team gave up and quit and a trio of smack talking "pros" entered the game. In a team that had proceeded all the way to wave 5/7 on an EXPERT campaign, we eventually hit a snag and couldn't seem to proceed. Now, in the event that a player is clearly unfit to be playing the game they are in, you create one situation, but here's another. Now, he has all the right to play however he chooses, but do 3 other players, who might I add joined mid game after 3 others ragequit, deserve the right to kick him out?Ī lot of people seem inclined to argue yes, but seriously people, if you don't want to play with "noobs" you shouldn't be joining public games with randomly selected players. Now mind you, this is a younger player (as was obvious due to the voice chat) and these users were being particularly rude to him. Rather than quitting the game they decided they'd kick the kid. Today I watched a younger player leave a game in tears because another three members (that's all it takes mind you, so if you create a party of 3 intentionally, here's your exploit to forcefully shaping a team) didn't feel he was doing well enough. Personally, I feel everyone deserves a chance, and if you're complaining a teammate isn't good enough it's my opinion it's YOUR fault for not joining with a team of players you trust, but let's set that argument aside for a moment. Is it fair that a player with experience should have the right to muscle out younger or less experience players because it's a "waste of their time"? To an expert player who doesn't feel like wasting their time with someone they deem unfit on their teamĪnd to a player who is trying to complete, say their first tour but still has some experience. Votekicking in MvM is a flawed system, and it generates two distinct PoVs: It's been a matter for quite some time and I feel it's equally high time that this issue be addressed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |